I went around today and asked some
of the students what they thought diversity meant to their school. Michelle Ludlow[,] a Chemistry
PhD[,] had this to say[:] “Well, its people from different backgrounds all getting together here.” Konrad Malowski, a fourth year Polish international
PhD student in Computer Science and Engineering[,] said[,] “To me it means a variety of different people that are from different cultures[,] not just different States.” Last but not least one young man said, “Look around you, this is diversity of the school at its best. There are all sorts of people here, getting together, getting along, all rooting for the same team and yet they are all different. GO PSU!” Obviously I was asking people at a tailgate party. However, I am not sure I can completely go along with his view, as being different and in the same spot does not necessarily mean that you will get along. However I think he was driving at the point that in the end it is football that will bring us all together.
So the general consensus of the students is that the differences in
the people is what make the definition of PSU’s diversity. As for the school’s opinion they actually have a Diversity Committee to explain the certain aspects of the schools diversity. For example[,] Challenge Three for the committee is “[r; don't capitalize the beginning of quotations]ecruiting and retaining a diverse student body,” because “[h]aving a population of students who come to problems with different perspectives increases the likelihood that good solutions will be found…and also enhances their abilities to have civil conversations around difficult issues.” The committee also states it is necessary to recruit and retain a very diverse work force because “[h]aving a diverse workforce is necessary to provide students with different ways of thinking and doing and helping them to work and learn in a global society. We are proud of our successes in diversifying our faculty, less so in diversifying our staff.” "Less so in diversifying our staff", does that mean all the janitors and secretaries are the same?
Finally, one of the other items of the committee’s list is organizational change to support
our (the school’s
) diverse goals. In 2003 the school’s leadership structure was reorganized to include a new position: Assistant Dean for Equity and Diversity. According to them [who?] “the creation of a position at this level clearly demonstrates the school’s moral and financial commitment to diversity.” I was unaware that diversity was a financial commitment. [Okay, stop doing this. It's fine to critique the views of others, but these one liners at the end of quotes is a really bad habit it to fall into, its academically unrigorous.]
What I drew from all of this is that the students only perceive diversity to be about the differences in the students and not much more. For the Diversity Committee[,] it seems to mean making sure you have enough of all types of people. Enough of students from international, to minority, to mature students as well as the same for the faculty (but apparently not for the rest of the staff), however this seems very number crunching and “goal meeting” to me [this sent. is very awkwardly worded]. They also state that because of all of these things, along with the
creating [creation] of a new leadership position, it means that they are ready to commit to diversity morally and financially. I can’t pretend to know exactly what they mean by that, but it all seems like a sales pitch to me.
Also I say “goal meeting” because in the 1970’s state universities established racial quotas and they picked the best applicants from each group. However, it was perceived that the quotas lowered the quality of the student body overall.
So [I]n 1978 the Supreme Court decided to outlaw the quotas and made a diverse student “goal” for schools to try and reach instead, but with no penalty for not reaching it. I suppose they would just be seen as politically incorrect if they didn’t at least try. I don’t see too much difference between the two and I also have to wonder why diversity seems to primarily concern race when there are other things that make people different from one another.
It almost seems that they give all the tables of their statistics just to prove that they[,] like everyone[,] [... do what?] and also that they have tried to meet their goals. [The University seems to be saying: ]“[j]oin us because we can prove that there are others here that are just like you.” [H]ow diverse is that? On a personal level I think that the diversity here is great and it’s also great that the school goes out of its way to make it so. However, I think there is an underlying reason for doing it and that it’s not just about trying to improve
“us” the student body. I know that schools have certain standards and “goals” to meet because of our politically correct society and I think they go so far out of their way “in the name of diversity” more for this reason. Point in fact, me
,[:] schools are trying to raise their mature student percentages. I was most likely admitted because I fit a mature student profile and not because I proved to be a genius
because I didn’t.